Why are the pictures so tiny?
127
vote
I'm squinting at 200x150 pictures of the get-together.
I'm also wondering whether there's some potential for integration with other sites where people keep their photos (e.g., Flickr, Picasaweb). The RSS feeds for the blogs are pretty cool; I don't know whether something similar could be done for photos.
Jon(boy)
Bookmark/Search this post with:
By Jonboy on 2007-04-18 01:04
evan
Click on "original"
You can see the full-size images by clicking on "original". But I agree - we should probably have an intermediate size, around the 400px range.
As for integration with other services: YES. I think this was working at one point, but I'm not sure where we are right now. Maj?
Jonboy
Cool.
I think I tried this on one picture that had a tiny original (I'm never going to be able to find it again) and gave up. Duh. Thanks, I feel better.
admin
Images
I'd like to create a separate template for displaying full size images-- maybe without the left nav.
As for image feeds-- yes we're working on this. Just as with blogs, we'd rather not reinvent the wheel and/or ask people to uproot themselves from the services they are currently using. There are a couple options for allowing image rss feeds, a "flickr picker" and other modules I' trying out on the dev site.
I'll post something soon for you (Jonboy, Super RSS Beta Tester) to try out.
As always, thanks for the feedback, Admin Maj
Jonboy
RSS
I *believe* my Flickr RSS feed is http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photos_public.gne?id=41659265@N00&tags=travel&format=atom. I had mostly used Picasaweb, but I can't figure out how to get an RSS feed out of there. So I don't have a lot of pictures there. (In fact, the Cologne ones were just uploaded this week to hit the minimum of 5, which should eventually get my account off "pending".)
So, whenever you're ready, it's available for testing. If it works, I'll switch to that away from Picasaweb.
Jonboy
admin
New size option
I added a new image size called "display"
It looks like this: http://extra.wikitravel.org/node/696?size=display
Would that be a better default?
Admin maj
Jonboy
Default
I think the display size would be better for a default. If I click on an image, that seems like a reasonable size. The smaller size might be a reasonable default for pix embedded in blogs or other places.
IMHO.
Jonboy
admin
Bumped up
Ok, I`'ve bumped the image display default to 500 x 500. I'll have to go back and see how that looking in blogs too...
I'll start working on a new image display template for the full size.
Thanks
admin
Fall back
I had to roll it back to the smaller size as it was breaking blogs... I'll try to work out how to have the image pages use a different size from the inline images (it's not working as advertised)...
You can still look at the display and original sizes by clicking on the links.
thanks admin maj
Post new comment